At AI.nl, we extensively tested Sora, OpenAI's latest AI imager and video generator. The goal: see if this tool can beat the competition in terms of speed, price-quality, image quality and functionality. The competition is fierce, with names like LumaLabs and Kling already making a big impression. But does Sora live up to the expectations? Spoiler alert: no.
To use Sora at all, you already have to put in quite a bit of effort. The system is not officially available in the Netherlands, so a VPN connection to a server in the US is necessary. Additionally, you'll need a paid account: $20 per month for the basic version or $200 for a Pro account. We tested with the Pro account, but even that disappointed.
Here are the results of our test:
If we compare Sora with the established names, the difference quickly becomes clear:
The only advantage of Sora is the integrated video editor, which makes the post-processing process easier. But if the basic output isn't usable, it's of little use.
For a tool that was sold to us as a revolutionary, Sora seriously disappoints. With slow rendering, poor image quality, limited accessibility (VPN!) and a high price, it's hard to recommend this product. The competition is better on almost all fronts.
Our tip: Choose alternatives such as LumaLabs and save yourself the frustration and money. Although Sora has potential, it is currently the worst thing it will ever be. There is hope for the future, but now it's better to skip this experiment.
.svg)
